CELG(4) Hsg 04
Dear Sirs
Inquiry into the provision of affordable housing
This letter is sent on behalf of ‘WREN’ (Wales Rural Housing Enablers Network).
WREN is made up of the 11 Rural Housing Enablers currently operational across rural Wales. Rural Housing Enablers (RHEs) work with community groups, Local Authorities and developers, both public and private sector, to address the shortage of affordable housing in the rural/semi rural counties of Wales.
The WREN network works together, by considering and addressing strategic issues relevant to the provision of rural affordable housing in Wales.
We would like to put forward the following comments in response to the inquiry.
Social Housing Grant is effective in delivering affordable homes but has limitations. In most circumstances schemes are made a priority in areas of greatest population, and where developments can be delivered most economically. The result of this is that smaller sites, particularly in rural areas are overlooked in favour of larger schemes, in urban areas. Whilst understanding the need to maximise the efficiency when spending money, Greater importance needs to be placed on long term economic and social benefits to rural communities, of providing homes for families on modest/low incomes to stay within areas where they have connections and work. We feel that a perhaps a proportion of SHG should be ring fenced for small scale rural developments.
Other forms of subsidy, particularly Strategic Capital investment Fund have proved effective over recent years, allowing the public sector to develop sites which had stalled due to the prevalent market conditions.
There is an increasing awareness of the need for alternatives to public subsidy to deliver affordable homes. Developers and lenders are devising their own programmes such as the LAMS scheme or other “helping hand” or shared equity schemes to promote home ownership. More Local Authorities are looking to provide equity loans to first time buyers, existing owners or private landlords. Some, Sir Fon is an example, intend to pilot the provision of loans to self builders of affordable housing which is an area where major lenders often refuse mortgages. We feel there is great potential for RSL’s to work with smaller private developers on mixed tenure sites, and to consider investment funding from private sources such as pension funds.
Other alternatives to public subsidy include properties offered for sale at below market price on new developments, or payments of commuted sums on sites below threshold limits, which can then be used in pla